חובה

• Anderson, R.C. and Armbruster, B.B. (1990). Some maxims for learning and instruction. Teachers College Record, 91 (3), 396-408.
• Jacobson, M.J., Mauri, C., Mishra, P. and Kolar, C. (1995). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia (4), 321-364.
• Spiro, R.J., Feltovitch, P.L., Jacobson, M.J., and Coulson, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructionism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 24-33.

רשות

• אלכסנדר, ג' (2004). היפרטקסט – טכנולוגיה חדשה או אוריינות אחרת? סקריפט – אוריינות: חקר, עיון ומעש, 8-7, 38-19.
• חזוני, י' (2001). על המהפכה השקטה במערכת החינוך. תכלת, 10, 64-41.
• ג'רום, ג' "ק (2002). שלושה בסירה אחת, הספר המוער. הוצאת אריה ניר.
• סלומון, ג' (2000). טכנולוגיה וחינוך בעידן המידע. חיפה: הוצאת הספרים של אוניברסיטת חיפה/ זמורה-ביתן.
• רימור, ר' (2002). מחיפוש מידע לבניית ידע: תהליכי ארגון ובניית ידע בסביבות ממוחשבות של מסדי נתונים. עבודת דוקטור, אוניברסיטת בן גוריון.
• עשת, י' (2004). אוריינות דיגיטלית: מיומנויות חשיבה בסביבות דיגיטליות. סקריפט – אוריינות: חקר, עיון ומעש, 8-7, 78-61.

• Anderson, J.R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.
• Anderson, J.R., and Bower, G.H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
• Balcytiene, A. (1999). Exploring individual processes of knowledge construction with hypertext. Instructional Science, 27, 303-328.
• Barrett, E. (1988). Text, context and Hypertext. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Becker, D. and Dwyer, M. (1994). Using Hypermedia to Provide Learner Control. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3 (2), 155-172.
• Beeman, W.O., Anderson, K.T., Bader, G., Larkin, J., McClard, A.P., McQuilian, P. and Shields, M. (1987). Hypertext and pluralism: From linear to non-linear thinking. Proceedings of Hypertext '87 (pp.67-88). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
• Bendixen, L.D., and Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research; 28 (1), 15-30.
• Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Berge, Z.L. and Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education 15 (3), 5-18.
• Bromme, R. and Stahl, E. (2002). Writing Hypertext and Learning: Conceptual and Empirical Approaches. Boston: MA: Pergamon.
• Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Burbules, N.C. and Callister, T.A. (1996). Knowledge at the crossroads: Some alternative futures of hypertext learning environments. Educational Theory, 46 (1), 23-50.
• Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly (July 1945).
• Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T. and Chiou, S.K. (2002). Use of hierarchical hyper concept map in web-based courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27 (4), 335-353.
• Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (4), 449-460.
• Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., Farr and M.J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 53 (4), 445–449.
• Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Education Technology Research and Development, 42 (2), 21-29.
• Collier, G. (1987). Thoth II: Hypertext with explicit semantics. Proceedings of Hypertext '87, (pp. 269-289). NC: Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina.
• Collins, A.M., and Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 8, 240-247.
• Crowder, R.G. (1982). The psychology of reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Daniels, J., Takach, B.S., and Varnhagen C. (2002). Getting stuck in the world wide web: The impact of design on navigation. In P. Barker and S. Rebelsky, (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 371-372). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
• Delany, P. and Gilbert, R. (1992). Hypercard stacks for Fielding's Joseph Andrews: Issues of design and content. In: P. Delaney and G. Landow (Eds.) Hypertext and literary studies (pp. 287-298). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
• Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Trans. B. Massumi). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
• Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics: Third Special Issue on Cognitive Ergonomics, 35 (10), 1297-1326.
• Dillon, A. (1996). Myths, misconceptions, and an alternative perspective on information usage and the electronic medium. In J.R. Rouet, J.J. Levonen, A. Dillon and R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 25-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Dillon, A. (2000). Designing a better learning environment with the Web: Problems and prospects. CyberPsychology and behavior, 3 (1), 97-101.
• Dillon, A. and Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
• Dodge, B. (1995). Some thoughts about WebQuests. http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html
• Dodge, B. (2001). Five rules for writing great webQuests. Learning and Leading with Technology, 128 (8). חמישה כללים לכתיבת קווסט מעולה
• Duffy, T.M. (1997). Strategic teaching frameworks: An instructional model for learning complex, interactive skills. In C.R. Dills and A J. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructinal development paradigms (pp. 571-593). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Dryden, L.M. (1994). Literature, student-centered classrooms, and hypermedia environments. In C. Selfe and S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 282-304). New York: The modern language association of America.
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13 (1), 93-106.
• Eshet, Y., Epstein, A., Hammer, R. and Tal, E. (2003). Bridging the gap: A constructivistic pedagogical model for distance learning in the academia. In: T. Ottman and I. Tomek (Eds.), Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia (pp.1265-1267).
• Flower, L., and Hayes, J. R. (l981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32, 365-387.
• Foss, C.L. (1989). Detecting lost users: Empirical studies on browsing hypertext (INRIA Technical Report No. 972, Programme 8). Sophia-Antipolis, France: INRIA.
• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretative theory of culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
• Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing.
• Gray, S.H. (1990). Using protocol analysis and drawing to study mental model construction during hypertext navigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (4), 359-377.
• Jacobson, M.J. and Spiro, R.J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12 (4), 301-333.
• Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Jonassen, D.H., Dyer, D. and Peters, K. (1996). Cognitive flexibility hypertexts on the Web: Engaging learners in meaning making. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 119-134). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Jonassen, D.H. (1986). Hypertext principles for text and courseware design. Educational Psychologist, 21 (4), 269-292.
• Jonassen, D.H. (1989). Hypertext/hypermedia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Jonassen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C.M. Reigeluth, (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. II) (pp. 215-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Klein, L., and Eason, K. (1991). Putting social science to work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Landow, G. (1992). Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Last, D.A., O'Donnell, A.M. and Kelly, A.E. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10 (1), 3-25.
• Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Ciaparu, I., Robinson, J. and Shniderman, B. (2003). Help! I'm lost: User frustration in web navigation. IT and Society, 1 (3), 18-26. http://www.itandsociety.org/
• Lee, M.J. and Tedder, M.C. (2003). The effects of three different computer texts on readers' recall (Based on working memory capacity). Computers in Human Behavior, 19 (6), 767-783.
• Lee, Y. and Lehman, J. (1993). Instructional cueing in hypermedia: A study with active and passive learners. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2 (1), 25-37.
• Lehto, M., Zhu, W. and Carpenter, B. (1995). The relative effectiveness of hypertext and text. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 7 (4), 293-313.
• McEneaney, J.E. (2003). Does hypertext disadvantage less able readers? Journal of educational computing research, 29 (1), 1-12.
• McKnight, C., Dillon, A. and Richardson, J. (1991). Hypertext in context. Cambridge University press.
• McManus, T.F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a Web-based hypermedia learning environment: Nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(2): 219-251.
• Nachmias, R. (2003). Research framework for the Study of A Campus-Wide Web-Based Academic Instruction Project. http://www.biu.ac.il/bar-e-learn/meytal_rafi_nahmias.htm
• Nelson, T. (1987). Literary Machines. Mindful Press, Sausalito, California.
• Niederhauser, D.S., Reynolds, R.E., Salmen, D. J. and Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23 (3), 237-255.
• Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kaufma.
• Paas, F., Renkl, A. and John Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1-4.
• Psotka, J., Kerst, S. and Westermann, T. (1993). The use of hypertext and sensory-level supports for visual learning of aircraft names and shapes. Behavior Research Methods. 25 (2), 168-172.
• Rouet, J.F. and Levonen, J.J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empyrical studies and their implications. In J.F. Rouet, J.J. Levonen, A. Dillon and R.J. Spiro, (Eds.), Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 9-23). NY: Erlbaum.
• Smilowitz, E. (2001). Do Metaphors Make Web Browsers Easier to Use? http://www.baddesigns.com/mswebcnf.htm
• Snyder, I. (1997). Hypertext: the electronic labyrinth. New York University Press.
• Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J. and Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-stuctured domains. In The Tenth Annual Conferece Of The Cognitive Science Society (pp. 4-13). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Spiro, R.J., and Jehng, J.C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. I: D. Nix and R.J. Spiro, (Eds.), Cognition, Education and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
• Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. and Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10 (3), 251-296.
• Yang, S.C. (2001). Synergy of constructivism and hypermedia from three constructivist perspectives – social, semiotic, and cognitive. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24 (4), 321-361.
• Zumbach, J., Reimann, P. and Koch, S. (2001). Influence of passive versus active information access to hypertextual information resources on cognitive and emotional parameters. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25 (3), 301-318.
• Zumbach, J. and Reimann, P. (2002). Enhancing learning from hypertext by inducing a goal orientation: Comparing different approaches. Instructional Science, 30 (4), 243-267.